# Super Intelligence in Federal Procurement: Acquisition Lifecycle and Agency Purchasing

Executive Order 14434 directs federal executive agencies to adopt Super Intelligence terminology across non-statutory acquisition documents while maintaining statutory definitions under 15 U.S.C. 9401(3). Understanding agency purchasing rules, distinguishing vendor obligations from internal mandates, and coordinating procurement records allows contracting officers and industry partners to navigate the four-stage federal acquisition lifecycle without compliance friction.

Source: https://fast.io/resources/super-intelligence-in-federal-procurement/
Author: [Tom Langridge](https://fast.io/authors/tom-langridge/)
Last reviewed: 2026-10-08

## What Executive Order 14434 Changes Across Federal Acquisition

As agencies begin using Super Intelligence in place of artificial intelligence in their own documents under Executive Order 14434, vendors and contracting teams face two questions: whether private companies must rebrand their products to bid on federal work, and whether existing contracts and commercial catalogs keep their current wording. The answer determines how contracting personnel draft solicitations, how industry partners respond to requests for proposals, and how agencies evaluate technical offerings without creating legal discrepancies.

The administrative foundation for this terminology shift took effect on September 29, 2026, when the White House issued [Executive Order 14434](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/inaugurating-the-era-of-super-intelligence/), titled "Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence." Under Section 2(a) of the order, executive departments and agencies are directed, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to use "Super Intelligence" and the abbreviation "SI" in place of "Artificial Intelligence" and "AI" in official correspondence, public communications, websites, reports, policy documents, and other non-statutory documents within the executive branch. Section 1 establishes an administrative policy that executive agencies will not acknowledge the usage of earlier terms in applicable settings.

For procurement professionals and industry proposal teams, the bare abbreviation SI introduces immediate communication hazards. Outside the context of Executive Order 14434, SI designates the International System of Units (Système International d'Unités) in physical sciences and engineering, the sacroiliac joint in medical records, Sports Illustrated in commercial media, and "systems integrator" in government procurement. To prevent confusion during technical evaluations, acquisition personnel and proposal authors should spell out "Super Intelligence (SI)" on first appearance across every procurement document, solicitation, and technical proposal volume.

The legal standard governing this terminology is set forth in Section 3(a) of Executive Order 14434:

"For purposes of this order, and except where otherwise provided by law, the terms 'Super Intelligence' and 'SI' mean the technologies and systems encompassed by the term 'artificial intelligence' as defined in section 9401(3) of title 15, United States Code."

That statutory provision, [15 U.S.C. 9401(3)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/9401), was enacted by Congress in the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020:

"The term 'artificial intelligence' means a machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations or decisions influencing real or virtual environments."

Because Section 3(a) incorporates 15 U.S.C. 9401(3) directly, federal Super Intelligence and artificial intelligence name the exact same systems in federal usage today. The statutory definition focuses entirely on functional capabilities, such as predictive models, automated decision support, computer vision, and natural language processing. It establishes no cognitive autonomy benchmark or superhuman threshold. Replacing artificial intelligence with Super Intelligence across executive agency communications is likely to produce administrative and procedural adjustments rather than substantive statutory changes in the near term.

This statutory grounding separates federal policy from computer science research concepts:

- Federal Super Intelligence (two capitalized words, abbreviated as SI) is an administrative label for existing operational software meeting 15 U.S.C. 9401(3).

- Research superintelligence (one compound word, commonly abbreviated as ASI for artificial superintelligence) is a hypothetical future system exceeding human expert capabilities across virtually all domains, which does not exist today. Commercial research laboratories, including Meta Superintelligence Labs, Microsoft's MAI Superintelligence Team, and Safe Superintelligence Inc., identify artificial superintelligence as an aspirational research target.

In federal procurement, Super Intelligence is the term agencies use, to the maximum extent permitted by law, in place of AI in their non-statutory documents, which can include market research notices and procurement forecasts.

Federal contractors and agency acquisition personnel must also note the legal limits established in Section 4(c) of Executive Order 14434. The text provides that the order creates no right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its agencies, officers, or any other person. The order directs executive agencies in their administrative practices, not private commercial entities.

## How the 4-Stage Federal Acquisition Lifecycle Operates Under EO 14434

Federal procurement follows structured acquisition phases governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations). Executive Order 14434 affects each phase differently, depending on whether an acquisition artifact is a non-statutory agency document or a formal legal instrument.

Acquisition professionals and industry partners can evaluate terminology requirements across four primary lifecycle stages:

### Stage 1: Market Research, Sources Sought, and Procurement Forecasts

During pre-solicitation activities under FAR Part 10, executive agencies gather industry capabilities to determine whether commercial items can meet government requirements. Agency procurement forecasts, Industry Day slide decks, Sources Sought notices, and Requests for Information (RFIs) published on SAM.gov are agency public communications, so they may use SI under Section 2(a).

Contracting officers and program managers may use Super Intelligence (SI) when describing automated analytical capabilities, machine learning tools, or algorithmic decision-support requirements in these non-statutory publications. When commercial vendors respond to RFIs and Sources Sought notices, they should mirror the agency's terminology while explicitly referencing the functional capabilities defined in 15 U.S.C. 9401(3).

### Stage 2: Solicitation Preparation and Requirements Definition

When contracting officers draft formal solicitations under FAR Part 12 (Commercial Products and Services) or FAR Part 15 (Contracting by Negotiation), documents divide into statutory provisions and narrative requirement descriptions.

In non-statutory solicitation components, such as the Statement of Work (SOW), Performance Work Statement (PWS), Section L (Instructions to Offerors), and Section M (Evaluation Factors for Award), executive agencies may adopt Super Intelligence terminology. For example, a civilian agency solicitation may instruct offerors to detail their "Super Intelligence operational safeguards and model monitoring protocols."

In contrast, formal statutory references and standard contract clauses prescribed by the FAR remain unchanged. Standard FAR provisions incorporated by reference keep their text, because the FAR changes only through FAR rulemaking, and Section 2(b) does not require previously issued regulations to be altered.

### Stage 3: Proposal Submission, Technical Evaluation, and Source Selection

During source selection, offerors submit multi-volume proposal packages, and agency Source Selection Evaluation Boards (SSEBs) evaluate proposals against Section M criteria.

Proposal authors should mirror the agency's solicitation terminology throughout Volume I (Technical Approach) and Volume II (Management Approach). If an agency RFP evaluates an offeror's "Super Intelligence verification framework," proposals that refer solely to "AI verification" create scoring friction. A deficiency under FAR 15.001 is a material failure to meet a government requirement, not a choice of word, but matching the solicitation's terms makes the proposal easier to check against the compliance matrix.

Volume III (Past Performance) should keep the contract titles shown on the award documents; Section 2(b) does not require those historical documents to change. Offerors cite prior projects using the exact legal titles recorded on historical award documents and in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

### Stage 4: Contract Award, Administration, and Performance Reporting

The final stage encompasses contract execution on Standard Form 33 or Standard Form 1449, task order issuance, deliverable reviews, and contract modifications under FAR Part 43.

The formal contract instrument establishes the legal rights of the parties. If an award incorporates a commercial supplier's standard commercial price list or GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) labor category, established labor titles (such as "Senior AI Engineer" or "Data Scientist") remain legally effective without administrative alteration. Billing classifications continue under established schedule terms.

In post-award administration, contractors may use the agency's SI terminology in progress reports, briefings, and design documents when the agency asks for it; the order itself does not require contractors to. CPARS evaluations record performance under the contract's awarded title.

The following comparison table demonstrates how terminology applies across each stage of the federal acquisition lifecycle:

| Acquisition Stage | Governing Document Types | Agency Terminology Requirement | Contractor Action | Regulatory and Legal Authority |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Stage 1: Market Research | RFIs, Sources Sought, agency procurement forecasts, Industry Day briefings | Super Intelligence (SI) used in all non-statutory market research notices | Mirror SI terminology in RFI responses; map capabilities to 15 U.S.C. 9401(3) | FAR Part 10; EO 14434 Sec. 2(a) |
| Stage 2: Solicitation Preparation | RFPs, SOW, PWS, Section L instructions, Section M evaluation factors | Super Intelligence (SI) used in requirement narratives and instructions | Review Section L/M; request clarification if terms conflict with FAR clauses | FAR Part 12 & Part 15; EO 14434 Sec. 2(a) & 2(b) |
| Stage 3: Proposal Evaluation | Technical approach, management plan, compliance matrix, past performance | SSEB scores against RFP terminology; evaluates technical compliance | Mirror SI in technical volumes; preserve original titles in past performance | 48 CFR FAR 15.305; EO 14434 Sec. 2(b) & 3(a) |
| Stage 4: Contract Administration | Award forms (SF-33, SF-1449), monthly status reports, CPARS evaluations | SI used in agency progress meetings and non-statutory deliverables | Maintain legal contract titles for billing; use SI in operational reports | 48 CFR FAR Part 42 & Part 43; EO 14434 Sec. 2(b) |

Tracking the distinction between non-statutory narratives and legal contract instruments across these four stages prevents compliance errors during bidding and administration.

## Why Private Vendor Obligations Differ from Agency Purchasing Mandates

Executive Order 14434 does not require private companies to rebrand their products or change their operations.

Executive Order 14434 directs the executive branch of the federal government. Section 2(a) identifies its audience: "To the maximum extent permitted by law, executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall use 'Super Intelligence' and 'SI' in place of 'Artificial Intelligence' and 'AI' in official correspondence, public communications, websites, reports, policy documents, and other non-statutory documents within the executive branch."

The order contains no regulatory mandate requiring private software vendors, government contractors, or commercial cloud providers to change their corporate marketing, modify commercial software titles, or alter internal corporate governance. Section 4(c) affirms that the directive creates no enforceable legal right or benefit against the federal government, underscoring its internal administrative character.

### Agency Purchasing Requirements

Section 2(a) applies, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to agencies' non-statutory documents. In purchasing, that can include:

- Agency procurement forecasts and website descriptions of upcoming technology initiatives may use Super Intelligence.

- Solicitations, Performance Work Statements, and Requests for Proposals issued by executive agencies may use the terminology in narrative sections.

- Internal policy memoranda, agency acquisition guides, and procurement training materials may adopt the new designations.

Executive agencies cannot unilaterally alter federal statutes or existing regulations. When an agency purchases commercial software under FAR Part 12, it acquires commercial items as they exist in the commercial marketplace.

### Commercial Vendor Boundaries

Commercial technology vendors and federal contractors operate under distinct commercial and contractual boundaries:

- Corporate branding and product names: Private technology companies are under no legal obligation to rename their commercial off-the-shelf software or corporate trademarks. A commercial enterprise software product titled "Clinical AI Diagnostics" does not require renaming to "Clinical SI Diagnostics."

- GSA Multiple Award Schedules: Commercial vendors holding GSA Multiple Award Schedule contracts do not need to submit administrative contract modifications to rename labor categories or product descriptions. Established Special Item Numbers (SINs), labor category titles, and commercial price lists stay in effect as awarded; Section 2(b) does not require them to change.

- Proposal responsiveness: While private vendors are not legally bound by the executive order itself, they are bound by the instructions of specific solicitations under FAR Part 15. If an agency issues an RFP requiring offerors to describe their "Super Intelligence technical architecture," an offeror should adopt that terminology in its technical volume to demonstrate responsiveness to Section M evaluation criteria.

- Past performance records: Offerors must not alter the historical titles of past contracts cited in Volume III (Past Performance). Section 2(b) states that nothing in that section requires the alteration of previously issued regulations, contracts, grants, or other historical documents. Modifying the title of a completed contract risks evaluation discrepancies against official records in CPARS.

The following table clarifies the operational division of responsibility between federal agencies and private commercial contractors:

| Operational Area | Federal Agency Requirement | Commercial Contractor Obligation | Compliance Recommendation |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Public Communications | Mandatory use of Super Intelligence (SI) under Section 2(a) | No requirement; commercial vendors retain private branding | Maintain established commercial product and marketing names |
| Solicitation Narratives | Mandatory use in SOW, PWS, and Section L/M instructions | Must address requirements as stated in the specific RFP | Mirror agency terminology in Volume I and Volume II responses |
| COTS Software Catalogs | Acquire commercial items under FAR Part 12 commercial rules | No requirement to rebrand commercial software catalogs | Supply commercial items with standard product documentation |
| GSA Schedule Contracts | Section 2(b) states that nothing in that section requires the alteration of existing schedules | No requirement to modify GSA labor categories or price lists | Bill against established GSA Schedule labor descriptions |
| Past Performance Records | Section 2(b) states that nothing in that section requires the alteration of historical CPARS records | Must cite historical contracts by original awarded titles | Include a vocabulary crosswalk note referencing 15 U.S.C. 9401(3) |

Contracting officers evaluate whether a proposed technical solution satisfies the functional work described in the solicitation. Because Section 3(a) defines Super Intelligence by reference to 15 U.S.C. 9401(3), contracting personnel have no statutory basis to disqualify a commercial vendor solely because its product literature uses the phrase artificial intelligence.

## Coordinating Procurement Files, Volume Reviews, and Audit Trails

Managing federal acquisition records requires precise document coordination across lengthy procurement timelines. A major agency procurement or contractor bid effort produces thousands of pages across market research reports, Independent Government Cost Estimates (IGCEs), source selection plans, draft solicitations, formal amendments, multi-volume proposal submissions, and subcontractor teaming agreements.

When teams store procurement documents across disconnected local drives, email threads, and disparate cloud folders, version control breaks down. A contracting office preparing a major solicitation may incorporate an outdated Performance Work Statement into a formal amendment. Similarly, a contractor bid team coordinating prime and subcontractor authors across multiple proposal volumes risks submitting conflicting terminology or outdated pricing tables, creating compliance vulnerabilities during source selection.

To keep acquisition materials aligned and verifiable, procurement teams and government contractors rely on centralized cloud workspaces.

[Fast.io workspaces](/product/workspaces/) provide dedicated environments where procurement professionals, capture teams, and their automated tools organize, review, and maintain procurement files. Organizations create dedicated, org-owned workspaces for specific acquisitions, solicitations, or proposal efforts, establishing a single source of truth for all participating personnel.

Key workspace capabilities for acquisition operations include:

- Granular access controls: Permissions are set per organization, workspace and share; a share gives an outside party access to only the files or folder placed in it. Prime contractors can invite external teaming partners and subcontractors to specific technical contribution folders while restricting access to proprietary cost models, indirect rate calculations, and executive volumes.

- Per-file version history: Every document uploaded to a workspace maintains a complete revision history. Acquisition teams can track iterative draft revisions across color-team review milestones (Pink Team for storyboards, Red Team for compliance, Gold Team for final sign-off), verify that mandatory edits were implemented, and restore earlier text if needed.

- Activity log: Fast.io keeps a detailed activity log of file uploads, changes, and permission and membership changes, so procurement managers can see who changed which file and when.

- Metadata Views: Complex solicitations often contain hundreds of pages across statements of work, Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs), and solicitation amendments issued on Standard Form 30 (SF-30). [Metadata Views](/product/document-data-extraction/) turn unstructured solicitation documents into structured, queryable data. Teams define extraction fields in plain language, and the system extracts amendment dates, mandatory FAR clauses, submission deadlines, and page constraints into a sortable spreadsheet view.

- Workspace e-signature: Teaming agreements, non-disclosure agreements, and proposal commitment letters can be prepared and sent for signature directly within the workspace through [e-signature](/product/e-signature/). Documents support sequential or parallel signer routing, optional one-time passcodes per signer, and a tamper-evident audit certificate filed back into the workspace upon execution.

Fast.io provides transparent subscription tiers on [Fast.io pricing](/pricing/). Organizations begin evaluating the platform through a 14-day trial on monthly plans, which requires a credit card.

| Plan Tier | Monthly Billing | Workspace Allowance | Included Storage | Monthly AI Work Credits |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Starter | $9.99 per month | 5 workspaces | 250 GB | 100,000 credits |
| Business | $49.99 per month | 50 workspaces | 5 TB | 600,000 credits |
| Enterprise | $199.99 per month | 200 workspaces | 25 TB | 3,000,000 credits |

Additional AI work credits can be added as procurement operations expand. Centralizing procurement documentation inside dedicated workspaces keeps acquisition records coordinated and auditable throughout the contracting lifecycle.

## What to Track Across Statutory Milestones, FAR Amendments, and Policy Timelines

Federal procurement professionals and government contractors must balance immediate solicitation compliance with forthcoming statutory and regulatory milestones. Executive Order 14434 initiates an administrative process that could influence federal contracting policy over the coming years.

The most immediate policy milestone appears in Section 3(b) of the order. That provision directs the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology (APST), who leads the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), to submit proposed legislative language for a federal definition of "Super Intelligence" and "SI" to the President within 60 days of the signing date. Because President Trump signed the order on September 29, 2026, this 60-day deadline arrives on November 28, 2026.

As of October 2026, no statutory definition of Super Intelligence exists in federal law. The November 28, 2026 report is an internal executive proposal submitted to the President, not an enacted statute. An executive order cannot alter statutory law; only an Act of Congress signed by the President can amend the United States Code. What the OSTP legislative proposal will contain, and whether Congress will introduce or enact conforming statutory amendments, remains undetermined as of October 2026.

Until Congress enacts new statutory language, or later Presidential action supersedes the order's definition (Section 3(a)), SI under the order means what 15 U.S.C. 9401(3) defines as artificial intelligence; each solicitation's own definitions govern that solicitation.

Acquisition professionals and government contractors should prepare for three potential administrative and legislative phases following the November 28, 2026 report:

### 1. Executive Review and Presidential Policy Directives

Following receipt of the OSTP proposal, the President will review the recommended legislative language and implementation strategies. The Executive Office of the President may issue presidential memoranda or Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars providing specific instructions to agency Senior Procurement Executives (SPEs) and Chief Acquisition Officers (CAOs). These instructions could set guidelines for using Super Intelligence in procurement forecasts and in the agency AI use case inventories that the Advancing American AI Act requires.

### 2. FAR Council Rulemaking

If the executive branch seeks to establish formal procurement regulations binding both civilian and defense agencies, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (FAR Council) must initiate formal rulemaking. The FAR Council, chaired by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy and including the Secretary of Defense and the Administrators of General Services and NASA, oversees Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

Formal amendments to the FAR require publishing a proposed rule in the Federal Register, opening a public comment period, and issuing a final rule with standardized contract clauses. Until the FAR is amended, or an agency issues an authorized deviation or supplement, standard FAR clauses keep their current text.

### 3. Congressional Legislation and Statutory Amendments

If the President formally transmits draft statutory language to Capitol Hill, the proposed bill would be introduced in the House of Representatives and the Senate. Committees of jurisdiction, which could include the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Armed Services Committees, would review the text, hold public hearings, and evaluate potential statutory changes. Any enacted statutory definition of Super Intelligence would update Title 15 and could introduce conforming amendments to procurement statutes in Title 10 (Armed Forces) and Title 41 (Public Contracts).

### Practical Checklist for Acquisition Personnel and Bidding Contractors

To maintain compliance while avoiding premature adjustments, procurement teams should follow five practical operating guidelines:

1. Anchor technical requirements to 15 U.S.C. 9401(3): Ground Statements of Work and proposal technical volumes in verifiable functional performance rather than marketing buzzwords.

2. Mirror agency solicitation vocabulary: Adopt the agency's primary solicitation terms across technical and management proposal volumes to align with Section M evaluation rubrics.

3. Preserve past performance integrity: Retain original legal contract titles in Volume III under the Section 2(b) savings clause to prevent CPARS record discrepancies.

4. Submit timely Requests for Clarification: When agency solicitations present conflicting terminology between narrative instructions and standard FAR clauses, submit formal pre-proposal questions to the Contracting Officer.

5. Seek professional legal counsel: Because Executive Order 14434 creates no enforceable private rights under Section 4(c), contractors facing complex compliance disputes or ambiguous contract terms should consult their organization's legal counsel or the cognizant Contracting Officer.

## Frequently asked questions

### How does Executive Order 14434 affect federal procurement?

Executive Order 14434 directs executive departments and agencies to use Super Intelligence and the abbreviation SI in place of Artificial Intelligence and AI across non-statutory acquisition documents, market research notices, and procurement forecasts. However, Section 2(b) states that nothing in that section requires the alteration of previously issued regulations, contracts, grants, or other historical documents, while Section 3(a) anchors the technical scope to 15 U.S.C. 9401(3).

### Are federal agencies required to use the term Super Intelligence in purchasing?

Section 2(a) directs agencies, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to use Super Intelligence (SI) in official correspondence, public communications, websites, reports, policy documents, and other non-statutory documents, which can include procurement forecasts and solicitation narratives. FAR clauses keep their text until the FAR is amended.

### What is the statutory basis for Super Intelligence in federal procurement?

The statutory basis for Super Intelligence in federal procurement is 15 U.S.C. 9401(3), enacted under the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020. Section 3(a) of Executive Order 14434 explicitly defines Super Intelligence and SI as the technologies and systems encompassed by the definition of artificial intelligence in 15 U.S.C. 9401(3).

### Does Executive Order 14434 require private contractors to rebrand their commercial AI products?

No. Executive Order 14434 directs executive branch agencies, not private commercial entities. Commercial technology vendors and federal contractors are not required to rename commercial off-the-shelf software, modify corporate branding, or alter GSA Multiple Award Schedule labor categories. Contractors only need to mirror agency terminology when responding to specific solicitations that use SI phrasing.

### How does Super Intelligence in federal procurement differ from artificial superintelligence in research?

Federal Super Intelligence (two capitalized words, abbreviated as SI) is an administrative label for existing operational software meeting the functional definition in 15 U.S.C. 9401(3). In contrast, artificial superintelligence (ASI) in computer science research refers to a hypothetical future system that would surpass human expert performance across all fields, which does not exist today.

### Can contracting officers reject bids that refer to artificial intelligence instead of Super Intelligence?

Contracting officers evaluate proposals against the criteria established in Section M of the solicitation. Because Section 3(a) defines SI by reference to 15 U.S.C. 9401(3), the substantive technological scope is identical. However, offerors should mirror the solicitation's specific terminology in technical volumes to demonstrate full responsiveness to evaluation rubrics.

### How should contractors handle past performance citations for contracts awarded prior to EO 14434?

Contractors must cite historical contracts using their original awarded titles in past performance volumes. Section 2(b) states that nothing in that section requires the alteration of previously issued contracts, grants, or other historical documents. Modifying historical contract titles risks record mismatches during evaluator verification against official records in CPARS.

### Will the November 28, 2026 OSTP report change federal procurement law immediately?

No. Section 3(b) directs the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology to submit proposed legislative language for a federal definition of Super Intelligence to the President. An executive recommendation cannot amend federal statutes or procurement regulations. Any statutory change requires legislation passed by Congress, while procurement rule changes require formal rulemaking by the FAR Council.

## Sources

- [Wiley: Executive Order Rebrands AI as “Super Intelligence” and Signals Potential Federal Legislative Changes](https://www.wiley.law/alert-Executive-Order-Rebrands-AI-as-Super-Intelligence-and-Signals-Potential-Federal-Legislative-Changes): Replacing artificial intelligence with Super Intelligence across federal agency communications is likely to produce administrative and procedural adjustments rather than substantive statutory changes in the near term.
- [Cornell Law School: Legal Information Institute (15 U.S.C. 9401)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/9401): Under 15 U.S.C. 9401(3), artificial intelligence is defined as a machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations or decisions influencing real or virtual environments.

## About Fast.io

Fast.io provides shared workspaces where people and AI agents work on the same files, with built-in semantic search and citation-backed chat over what they hold. Agents reach it through a remote MCP server, a REST API at https://api.fast.io/current/, and a command line client published on npm as @vividengine/fastio-cli. MCP setup is at https://mcp.fast.io/docs: Claude and most MCP clients connect to https://mcp.fast.io/mcp/tools, ChatGPT to https://mcp.fast.io/mcp/operations, and coding agents to https://mcp.fast.io/mcp/code.